Exclusive forum for HMG, a Free / Open Source xBase WIN32/64 Bits / GUI Development System
http://mail.hmgforum.com/
Hi MaestroRoberto Lopez wrote: <...>
Any opinions???
<...>
. . But, using <> works for all other purposes and produces no error, so, it is possible that the same 'bug report' about incremental builds be reported many times in the future...esgici wrote:Hi MaestroRoberto Lopez wrote: <...>
Any opinions???
<...>
Although using <> for #includes is not correct, IMHO there is no bug to report.
IMHO C programmers are strictly conservative, even fanatic about their habits
With best regards.
--
Esgici
I've suspected thatesgici wrote:As you please ...
Definitely, your opinion is always the best
Best regards
--
Esgici
Hi Roberto,Roberto Lopez wrote:...
Had you tested the "" vs, <> thing?
I'm interested to know if the problem arises with BCC builds too.
I've rebuilt HBMK2.exe and Harbour.exe from yesterday's SVN and it is working fine with <> too.gfilatov wrote:Hi Roberto,Roberto Lopez wrote:...
Had you tested the "" vs, <> thing?
I'm interested to know if the problem arises with BCC builds too.
Confirmed.
There is a similar problem with BCC builds too.
The HBMK utility have not an incremental feature with string
#include <minigui.ch>
in the PRG source...
Roberto,Roberto Lopez wrote: I've rebuilt HBMK2.exe and Harbour.exe from yesterday's SVN and it is working fine with <> too.
Please, note that -head=real has been changed to -head=native.
