Page 1 of 3

"Old computers did it better!"

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:34 pm
by esgici
https://youtu.be/0wDtxYeJdzg

Happy computering :D

Re: "Old computers did it better!"

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 12:26 am
by Roberto Lopez
esgici wrote:https://youtu.be/0wDtxYeJdzg

Happy computering :D
I MISS MY C64!!!!!!!

Re: "Old computers did it better!"

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 2:43 am
by esgici
Roberto Lopez wrote:[
I MISS MY C64!!!!!!!
You aren't alone ;)

Regards :D

Re: "Old computers did it better!"

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 7:16 am
by serge_girard
Those were the days !

Serge

Re: "Old computers did it better!"

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 7:21 am
by serge_girard

Re: "Old computers did it better!"

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 8:09 am
by vagblad
Roberto Lopez wrote:
I MISS MY C64!!!!!!!
esgici wrote: You aren't alone ;)
Oh my precious C64 .....so many memories and fun times.I actually wrote my first program on that C64, if i remember correctly the language was BasicVer 3.0?
Those peek and poke commands....... :D
Thanks Esgici for the memories.

PS: Anyone remember the casette loading times on the C64? :P

Re: "Old computers did it better!"

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 2:37 pm
by andyglezl
Yo empece a programar en una COMMODORE C16 que no tenia unidad de almacenamiento,
cada vez que la arrancaba, empezaba de nuevo a capturar el programa...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I started programming in a COMMODORE C16 that had no storage unit,
every time I booted, began again to capture the program ...


NAME C16
MANUFACTURER Commodore
TYPE Home Computer
ORIGIN U.S.A.
YEAR 1984
BUILT IN LANGUAGE Commodore BASIC 3.5 - Built-in machine code monitor (12 commands)
KEYBOARD 66 keys with 4 function keys and 4 cursor keys
CPU 7501
SPEED 0.89 MHz or 1.76 MHz
CO-PROCESSOR TED (video & sound)
RAM 16 KB (12 KB free for user)
ROM 32 KB
TEXT MODES 40 chars. x 25 lines
GRAPHIC MODES 320 x 200 / 320 x 160 (with 5 lines of text) / 160 x 200 / 160 x 160 (with 5 lines of text)
COLORS 121 (15 colours x 8 luminances + black)
SOUND two channels; 4 octaves + white noise
SIZE / WEIGHT 40.7 (W) x 20.4 (D) x 7.7 (H) cm
I/O PORTS Tape, Cardridge, Joystick (2), serial, Composite Video, TV
BUILT IN MEDIA Cassette unit. Provision for 5.25
OS ROM Based
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_16

Re: "Old computers did it better!"

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 2:57 pm
by mol
I've started with ZX Spectrum and Atari. 65XE. Happ old times!

Re: "Old computers did it better!"

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:34 pm
by srvet_claudio
mol wrote:I've started with ZX Spectrum
+1

and my with 48KB of RAM!!!

Re: "Old computers did it better!"

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 6:33 pm
by CalScot
In the summer of 1980, the very expensive new computer we got at work (I don't even remember the name!) had 64K of RAM. To use Visicalc (the original spreadsheet, loaded from an 8-inch floppy disc) took forever to load just the main menu, then, when you made a choice, it released the main menu from memory and loaded the code for the selected module. I think that each menu module was 3-5K, so after loading the OS and any module, you had a max of maybe 50K for data - which you could save if you took out the Visicalc program disc and put in another floppy -- if you'd remembered to format one first. All viewed in glorious green characters on a black screen, 80 x 24, on a monitor that weighed about as much as a small refrigerator and cost a whole lot more! Such memories!
We've come such a long way in the last 36 years!!