Page 3 of 3
Re: Facing Android Development
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:27 am
by serge_girard
Thanks Roberto.
What I thought to do is the following:
- HMG App for admin functions (INSERTS/DELETES/UPPDATES)
- HMTL for end-users (BROWSE mainly)
- HMG NETIO Server for the data and HMG App-functions
I will find another solution!
Serge
Re: Facing Android Development
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 9:14 pm
by Roberto Lopez
serge_girard wrote:Thanks Roberto.
What I thought to do is the following:
- HMG App for admin functions (INSERTS/DELETES/UPPDATES)
- HMTL for end-users (BROWSE mainly)
- HMG NETIO Server for the data and HMG App-functions
I will find another solution!
Serge
You are right, is a good approach, but what I'm saying, is that the best option, is to have your Apache web server in the same machine as your dbf files, so, there is no need to use NETIO on the web server CGI app.
But, if that is not possible to you for some reason, you could try to solve the problem, simply building your CGI, in that way that not requires Harbour dlls (check build.bat).
Re: Facing Android Development
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2014 10:21 am
by serge_girard
Hi Roberto,
That is right and that's indeed the way I'm doing.
However on the server-side for HTML some BROWSE-functions are quasi the same as on client-side, so I thought to reuse them (with NETIO) but the Harbour.dll give problem.
Serge
Re: Facing Android Development
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2014 2:57 pm
by Roberto Lopez
serge_girard wrote:Hi Roberto,
That is right and that's indeed the way I'm doing.
However on the server-side for HTML some BROWSE-functions are quasi the same as on client-side, so I thought to reuse them (with NETIO) but the Harbour.dll give problem.
Serge
You can build Harbour apps without dll dependences.
You only must to remove the '-shared' parameter in build.bat.
Then you'll be building a stand-alone app.
Re: Facing Android Development
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2014 9:02 pm
by serge_girard
Right!
Thanks, Serge